BOSTON – A Dorchester man was resentenced today in federal
court for his role in a 1999 conspiracy to rob an armored car depot in Easton,
Mass.
David Turner, 52, was resentenced by U.S. District Court
Judge Richard G. Stearns to time served and three years of supervised release.
The government recommended 310 months.
Turner was convicted by a federal jury in 2001 of conspiring
to rob the Loomis-Fargo armored car depot; attempting to rob the Loomis-Fargo
depot; possessing a grenade in furtherance of a crime of violence – the conspiracy to rob the facility;
possessing other firearms in furtherance of the robbery conspiracy; and two
counts of being a felon in possession of firearms. Turner had been in custody
since February 7, 1999.
At the time these crimes were committed, possession of a
grenade in furtherance of a crime of violence required a sentence of 30 years,
which had to run consecutively to any other sentence imposed in the case. In 2003 Judge Stearns sentenced Turner to 460
months in prison, calculated as follows: 100 months for the robbery conspiracy,
attempted robbery, and felon-in-possession counts; 360 months for possessing
the grenade in furtherance of a crime of violence; and 60 months for possessing
the other firearms in furtherance of a crime of violence. The sentences of 360 months and 60 months
were to run concurrently with one another but consecutive to the sentence for
the other convictions. The First Circuit
Court of Appeals affirmed Turner’s conviction and sentence in 2007.
In June 2019 the Supreme Court held part of the relevant
definition of “crime of violence” to be unconstitutional, and consequently
conspiracy to commit a crime of violence no longer qualifies as a crime of
violence. Accordingly, at today’s
resentencing Judge Stearns vacated these convictions and resentenced Turner
based on the remaining counts.
Evidence at the 2001 trial showed that in early 1999 Turner
joined a plot to rob the Loomis-Fargo armored car depot of $30-50 million. The
plot included Turner, Stephen Rossetti, Carmelo Merlino, William Merlino, and a
man who, unbeknownst to the others, was cooperating with the FBI. The
cooperator told the others that he had an insider at the armored car depot who
would help them commit the robbery. The plan was for Rossetti to provide
firearms, a grenade, an assault rifle, and other firearms, as well as bullet-proof
vests, walkie-talkies, police scanners and other hardware for use in the
robbery. The day of the robbery the insider would help the robbers gain access
to the facility and the cooperator would walk the insider back into the
facility with a gun to his head; Turner and Rossetti would follow them in
wearing bullet-proof vests armed with an assault rifle and grenade; Turner and
Rossetti would subdue and restrain the other guard, who was not privy to the
plan; and the robbers would then load a Loomis-Fargo truck with cash and drive
to Carmelo Merlino’s place of employment, TRC Auto Electric in Dorchester
(TRC). Turner announced at a meeting the night before the robbery was to take
place that if they were pursued by law enforcement along the way, they would
get out and “have it out” with the police.
The robbery was planned for Feb. 7, 1999 and the
participants were to meet early in the morning at TRC. Carmelo Merlino was arrested when he arrived
and William Merlino was arrested a short time later. Turner met Rossetti in a
parking lot in Quincy and they drove past, but did not stop at, TRC. They
returned to the Quincy parking lot and transferred items from Rossetti’s car to
Turner’s vehicle and then drove in Rossetti’s car back to the neighborhood of
TRC, where they were apprehended. A search of Turner’s vehicle in Quincy led to
the recovery of three duffel bags that contained, among other things, five
handguns; an assault rifle; ammunition and magazines for the firearms;
bullet-proof vests; walkie-talkies; police scanners; and a live military
fragmentation grenade.
At today’s hearing, the government recommended that Turner
be sentenced to 310 months. The government argued that the sentencing
guidelines do not adequately capture the seriousness of the offense because the
guidelines do not take into account the number of firearms the robbers planned
to use, the fact that they had a grenade that they planned to employ if
necessary, or the fact that they intended to engage in a violent confrontation
with the police if confronted.
No comments:
Post a Comment