PITTSBURGH, Pa. – A resident of Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania,
was sentenced in federal court for violating the Clean Air Act, United States
Attorney Scott W. Brady announced today.
United States District Judge Joy Flowers Conti sentenced
Vikas Jain, 48, to one month of imprisonment, followed by three years of
supervised release that will include nine months of home detention.
In connection with the defendant’s guilty plea and
sentencing, the Court was advised that the defendant controlled various
business entities focusing primarily on residential and commercial real estate
development and management. In approximately May 2012, the defendant, through
one such entity, purchased the George Westinghouse Research and Technology Park
(the Westinghouse Facility), a multi-building commercial and industrial complex
located on approximately 150 acres in Churchill, Pennsylvania. The Westinghouse
Facility was built between approximately the 1950s and 1970s, and it comprised
over one million square feet of testing, laboratory, and office space across
more than a dozen buildings. As the defendant acknowledged, he sought to
redevelop the Westinghouse Facility and surrounding property for commercial and
residential mixed-use purposes.
The defendant further admitted that, prior to completing the
purchase of the Westinghouse Facility, he obtained the results of an earlier
environmental assessment of the property, which identified the presence of
asbestos-containing materials (ACM) in, among other substances, floor tile and
pipe insulation located throughout the complex. Between approximately May 2012
and February 2017, the defendant, through entities he controlled, leased space
at the Westinghouse Facility to third-party tenants, including television
production companies. For the most part, however, the Westinghouse Facility
remained unused and unoccupied.
In connection with one licensing agreement in approximately
2015, the defendant obtained two asbestos-abatement permits from the Allegheny
County Health Department (ACHD) allowing for the proper removal of ACM in
portions of two of the buildings at the Westinghouse Facility. The removal was
completed by a licensed abatement contractor. Later, in early 2017, the
defendant, through a contractor working on the redevelopment project, obtained
a proposal from a different licensed abatement entity to inspect another
building that the defendant intended to demolish. The proposal was never
consummated.
Rather, as the defendant admitted, beginning no later than
approximately February 1, 2017, and continuing until February 28, 2017, he
directed various workers to remove previously unabated ACM from two buildings
at the Westinghouse Facility, including large quantities of ACM floor tiles,
mastic, and pipe insulation. The defendant further directed a worker to rent
floor grinders, which the workers then used to remove and pulverize ACM floor
tiles and mastic. The defendant did not apply for or obtain an ACHD permit for
the abatement activity, and workers conducted the removal of ACM without proper
protective clothing or adequate respirators. Once removed, ACM debris was
placed in black trash bags and taken by workers via a pick-up truck to a
dumpster located outside of one of the defendant’s residential rental
properties. As the defendant admitted, the contents of the dumpster, including
trash bags containing ACM, were subsequently taken to a local landfill that was
not qualified to receive asbestos-contaminated waste.
Finally, the defendant admitted that, after local Churchill
authorities and ACHD investigators learned of the illegal asbestos abatement,
he took steps to conceal the nature and extent of the removal activity,
including by causing grinders to be removed from the Westinghouse Facility,
cleaned, and, as to two grinders, returned to the equipment rental company
prior to inspection by ACHD. At no time did the defendant inform ACHD that the
grinders he presented for subsequent inspection had been cleaned of ACM or
otherwise were not the same ones that had been used in the Westinghouse
Facility.
Assistant United States Attorney Eric G. Olshan prosecuted
this case on behalf of the government, with assistance from Perry D. McDaniel,
Regional Criminal Enforcement Counsel of the Environmental Protection Agency.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation and Environmental Protection Agency’s
Criminal Investigation Division conducted the investigation of the defendant.
No comments:
Post a Comment