Related Forfeiture Complaint Filed for Approximately $12.3
Million in Funds is Largest Ever Seizure of IRGC-QF Related Funds
WASHINGTON
– Amir Dianat, 55, and Kamran Lajmiri, 42, both Iranian nationals, were charged
with violating U.S. export laws and sanctions against Iran in the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia.
A
two-count criminal complaint returned today charges Dianat and Lajmiri with
conspiracy to provide U.S. financial services to Iranian entities and their
front companies attempting to purchase a petroleum tanker, the Nautic, in September
2019. The complaint alleges that the
defendants concealed from the seller, financial institutions that clear U.S.
dollar transactions, and the U.S. government that the sale of this vessel was
destined for Iran, all as part of a scheme to enrich the defendants and other
conspirators, and to evade the regulations, prohibitions, and licensing
requirements of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (ITSR).
A related
verified civil forfeiture complaint was filed against $12,338,941.91. These funds were allegedly involved in this
scheme to launder funds into the United States to illicitly procure the Nautic.
The complaint alleges that this scheme involved the National Iranian Oil
Company, the National Iranian Tanker Company (NITC), and the IRGC-Qods Force
(IRGC-QF), all specially designated nationals.
The IRGC has also been designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization. This forfeiture action represents the largest
ever seizure of IRGC-QF related funds.
All funds of terrorist organizations are subject to forfeiture.
These
defendants purchased a crude oil tanker valued at over $10 million by illegally
using the U.S. financial system, defiantly violating U.S. sanctions,” said
Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers. “This is yet
another example of Iran brazenly using front companies and false documentation
in an attempt to hide the illegal transactions that the Iranian regime
desperately needs to fund its malign activities. The enforcement of U.S. sanctions and related
financial criminal laws is a major component of the National Security
Division’s commitment to protecting the national security of the United
States. I commend the efforts of the
prosecutors, agents, and analysts who uncovered this illegal scheme and whose
work resulted in the largest ever forfeiture action involving IRGC-QF.”
“Employing
civil forfeiture authorities specifically available to the U.S. Attorney’s
Office in the District of Columbia, we will continue to aggressively prosecute
those who abuse our financial system to support sanctioned entities,” said U.S.
Attorney Timothy J. Shea for the District of Columbia. “We will use every
measure available under the law, to include civil forfeiture to recover funds
for the victims of terrorism. These laws exist and serve to prevent hostile
countries from illicitly generating revenue, such as through the sale of oil,
to fund their weapons proliferation programs. Today’s charges are another
example of the dedicated and unrelenting efforts of our office, the FBI, and
HSI.”
“Today's
complaint demonstrates that those who use the U.S. financial system to benefit
the Iranian oil industry will be investigated by the FBI and prosecuted to the
fullest extent of the law,” said FBI Minneapolis Special Agent in Charge Rainer
Drolshagen. “Iran's petrochemical and petroleum sectors are primary sources of
funding for the Iranian regime, and the FBI will continue to aggressively
pursue those who illegally use the U.S. financial system for their benefit,”
Drolshagen added.
“Protecting our homeland encompasses many missions, including
safeguarding our nation's exports and currency," said Steven W. Cagen, HSI
Colorado Special Agent in Charge. “These criminals thought they could enrich
themselves while aiding Iran, a country that continues to pose a serious threat
to our nation’s security. They will now face the consequences of their
actions.”
A
concurrent action was filed by the Department of the Treasury, sanctioning
Dianat and his related front company, Taif Mining.
According
to the pleadings, beginning around May 2019 through December 2019, Dianat and
Lajmiri conspired to purchase the Nautic via a complex web of front companies,
including Taif Mining. After sending
the final wire payment to the seller, Taif Mining took possession of the
Nautic. It quickly changed its name and
began making trips to Iran to load Iranian petroleum. Because a U.S. bank froze
the funds related to the sale of the vessel, the seller never received payment. As a result, the seller instituted a civil
action in the U.A.E. to recover the vessel.
On March
15, 1995, the President, pursuant to IEEPA, issued Executive Order No. 12957,
finding that “the actions and policies of the Government of Iran constitute an
unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and
economy of the United States” and declaring “a national emergency to deal with
the threat.” In subsequent Executive Orders,
the President imposed economic sanctions, including a trade embargo, on
Iran. The Executive Orders and the ITSR
prohibit the exportation, re-exportation, sale, or supply, directly or
indirectly, to Iran of any goods, technology, or services from the United
States or by a United States person without prior authorization or license from
the United States Department of the Treasury, the Office of Foreign Assets
Control, located in Washington, D.C. The conspirators utilized the U.S.
correspondent banking system to process illicit transactions in U.S. Dollars,
and at no time were U.S. financial institutions alerted that they were
financing the purchase of a tanker for Iranian entities.
If
convicted, Dianat and Lajmiri would face a maximum of 20 years imprisonment.
The investigation
was conducted by special agents from the FBI Minneapolis Field Office and HSI
Colorado Springs.
The
details contained in the pleadings are mere allegations. All defendants are presumed innocent unless
and until proven guilty in a court of law, and the burden to prove
forfeitability in a civil forfeiture proceeding is upon the government.
Assistant
U.S. Attorneys Zia M. Faruqui and Brian Hudak, National Security Division Trial
Attorney David C. Recker, and Supervisory Paralegal Specialist Elizabeth Swienc
and Legal Assistant Jessica McCormick from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the
District of Columbia, are representing the government.
No comments:
Post a Comment