Three Alleged Indiana Gang Members Charged with Murder in Aid of Racketeering

WASHINGTON – In two separate cases, two members of the Two Six nation and one member of the Latin Kings were indicted for murder in aid of racketeering and other offenses, announced Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney David A. Capp of the Northern District of Indiana.

“Prosecutions, like the one announced here, demonstrate the effectiveness of the task force approach to fighting gang violence,” said Assistant Attorney General Caldwell.  “Along with our partners, the Criminal Division will aggressively work to release the grip that gangs hold on many neighborhoods across this country.”

“If you are a member of a violent street gang and you committed a murder or other violent act last week or last decade, we are coming at you,” said U.S. Attorney Capp.  He also reiterated his office’s continuing commitment to removing all members of these violent street gangs from the streets on northwest Indiana.

Marcus Lovell Jenkins, 26, of East Chicago, Indiana, and Charles Garcia-Berrios, 22, of Hammond, Indiana, were charged by superseding indictment with murder in aid of racketeering and use of a firearm in connection with a crime of violence for their alleged roles in the killing of Kemond Coleman.  Jenkins also is charged with possession of a firearm by a prohibited person.

According to the allegations in the indictment, Jenkins and Garcia-Berrios are members of the Two Six Nation street gang.  The indictment alleges that, on July 26, 2014, Jenkins and Garcia-Berrios shot and killed Coleman for the purpose of maintaining and enhancing their positions within the gang.  Garcia-Berrios and Two Six member Julio Ivan Cartagena previously were charged with the attempted murders of two individuals in this case.  All three defendants are in federal custody.

In a separate case, Anton James, 19, of Hammond, was charged by indictment with murder in aid of racketeering and murder resulting from the use of a firearm during a crime of violence for his alleged role in the murder of Martin Hurtado Sr.  According to the allegations in the indictment, James is a member of the Latin Kings street gang.  The indictment alleges that, on Oct. 28, 2014, James shot and killed Hurtado Sr. believing that he was Martin Hurtado Jr., whom James believed was a rival gang member.  James made his initial appearance in federal court this afternoon before Magistrate Judge Andrew Rodovich of the Northern District of Indiana.

Any charges and allegations in the indictments are merely allegations.  The defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.

These cases are the result of the investigative efforts of the FBI, the ATF, the East Chicago Police Department, the Hammond Police Department, the Lake County, Indiana, Sheriff’s Department and Lake County High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area officers and agents.  The Lake County Prosecutor’s Office also has provided assistance.  The Jenkins case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Andrew Creighton of the Criminal Division’s Organized Crime and Gang Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney David Nozick of the Northern District of Indiana.  The James case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Nozick.

Three Alleged Indiana Gang Members Charged with Murder in Aid of Racketeering

In two separate cases, two members of the Two Six nation and one member of the Latin Kings were indicted for murder in aid of racketeering and other offenses, announced Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney David A. Capp of the Northern District of Indiana.

“Prosecutions, like the one announced here, demonstrate the effectiveness of the task force approach to fighting gang violence,” said Assistant Attorney General Caldwell.  “Along with our partners, the Criminal Division will aggressively work to release the grip that gangs hold on many neighborhoods across this country.”

“If you are a member of a violent street gang and you committed a murder or other violent act last week or last decade, we are coming at you,” said U.S. Attorney Capp.  He also reiterated his office’s continuing commitment to removing all members of these violent street gangs from the streets on northwest Indiana.

Marcus Lovell Jenkins, 26, of East Chicago, Indiana, and Charles Garcia-Berrios, 22, of Hammond, Indiana, were charged by superseding indictment with murder in aid of racketeering and use of a firearm in connection with a crime of violence for their alleged roles in the killing of Kemond Coleman.  Jenkins also is charged with possession of a firearm by a prohibited person.

According to the allegations in the indictment, Jenkins and Garcia-Berrios are members of the Two Six Nation street gang.  The indictment alleges that, on July 26, 2014, Jenkins and Garcia-Berrios shot and killed Coleman for the purpose of maintaining and enhancing their positions within the gang.  Garcia-Berrios and Two Six member Julio Ivan Cartagena previously were charged with the attempted murders of two individuals in this case.  All three defendants are in federal custody.

In a separate case, Anton James, 19, of Hammond, was charged by indictment with murder in aid of racketeering and murder resulting from the use of a firearm during a crime of violence for his alleged role in the murder of Martin Hurtado Sr.  According to the allegations in the indictment, James is a member of the Latin Kings street gang.  The indictment alleges that, on Oct. 28, 2014, James shot and killed Hurtado Sr. believing that he was Martin Hurtado Jr., whom James believed was a rival gang member.  James made his initial appearance in federal court this afternoon before Magistrate Judge Andrew Rodovich of the Northern District of Indiana.

An charges and allegations in the indictments are merely allegations.  The defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.

These cases are the result of the investigative efforts of the FBI, the ATF, the East Chicago Police Department, the Hammond Police Department, the Lake County, Indiana, Sheriff’s Department and Lake County High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area officers and agents.  The Lake County Prosecutor’s Office also has provided assistance.  The Jenkins case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Andrew Creighton of the Criminal Division’s Organized Crime and Gang Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney David Nozick of the Northern District of Indiana.  The James case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Nozick.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Charges Bronx Man with Sex Trafficking of 16-Year-Old

May 10, 2010 - PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, GEORGE VENIZELOS, the Special Agent-in-Charge of the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"), and RAYMOND W. KELLY, the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, announced that RASHEED DAVIS, of the Bronx, New York, was arrested yesterday on charges of sex trafficking of a 16-year-old girl ("Victim-1"). DAVIS recruited Victim-1 to engage in multiple commercial sex acts that he arranged and, on at least one occasion, threatened and assaulted Victim-1 to force her to participate in such acts. DAVIS was arrested by the New York City Police Department ("NYPD") on May 6, 2010, in the Bronx. He is expected to be presented later today in Manhattan federal court.

According to the criminal Complaint filed today in Manhattan federal court:

In April 2010, DAVIS offered Victim-1 a place to live for approximately $150 per week (the "Premises") and told Victim-1 that DAVIS had a way for Victim-1 to make money. Thereafter, DAVIS arranged for Victim-1 to engage in multiple commercial sex acts with various individuals. DAVIS set the prices for the various sex acts and received the proceeds. On one or more occasions, DAVIS gave Victim-1 narcotics, including Ecstasy and marijuana, prior to causing Victim-1 to engage in commercial sex acts.

On May 5, 2010, DAVIS sent Victim-1 one or more text messages, in which DAVIS told Victim-1, in sum and substance, that DAVIS wanted Victim-1 to engage in a commercial sex act that night with a third party who would pay $300 in cash ("Client-1"). Victim-1 refused, at which time DAVIS sent threatening and intimidating text messages to Victim-1.

When Victim-1 returned to the Premises that same day, DAVIS physically assaulted Victim-1 in an effort to force Victim-1 to participate in a commercial sex act with Client-1. DAVIS told Victim-1 to tell Client-1 that Victim-1 was 19 years old. DAVIS then drove Victim-1 to a hotel outside of New York City ("Hotel-1"), where Victim-1 engaged in one or more commercial sex acts with Client-1 while DAVIS waited outside in a vehicle.

Victim-1 was paid $300 in cash by Client-1, and Victim-1 turned the cash over to DAVIS. DAVIS drove Victim-1 back to the Bronx in the early morning of May 6, 2010. Meanwhile, during the evening of May 5, 2010, and into the morning of May 6, 2010, Victim-1 sent text messages to a relative in an effort to get help. DAVIS was subsequently arrested in his car by the NYPD as he was driving with Victim-1 in the Bronx. At the time of DAVIS's arrest, DAVIS had in his possession the name and address of Hotel-1 and a hotel room number. Following DAVIS's arrest, law enforcement officers searched DAVIS's car and found, among other things, approximately $300 in cash.

On May 6, 2010, Client-1 was arrested by the Town of Ramapo Police Department. Following his arrest, Client-1 was advised of his Miranda rights, voluntarily waived those rights, and agreed to speak with law enforcement officers. Among other things, Client-1 stated, in sum and substance, that he had taken a car service from Newark International Airport in Newark, New Jersey, to Hotel-1, where he met with a female, who law enforcement officers identified as Victim-1. Client-1 also stated that, after engaging in sex acts with Victim-1, Client-1 paid Victim-1 $300 in cash.

DAVIS, 36, is charged with one count of sex trafficking involving a minor through the use of force, fraud, or coercion. If convicted, he faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years in prison, a maximum sentence of life in prison, and a maximum fine of $250,000, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense.

Mr. BHARARA praised the work of the FBI and the NYPD. Mr. BHARARA also thanked the Town of Ramapo Police Department and the Office of the District Attorney for Bronx County for their assistance. Mr. BHARARA added that the investigation is continuing.

U.S. Attorney PREET BHARARA stated: "Rasheed Davis allegedly lured a vulnerable, 16-year-old girl into the sex trade, and drugged and beat her into having sex for money. Sex trafficking is a brutal crime that, sadly, seems to be on the rise in this country. The Southern District of New York is committed to working with our partners at the FBI and NYPD to stop the shameless sexual exploitation of young girls and women."

Special Agent-in-Charge GEORGE VENIZELOS said: "Sex trafficking of a minor is a crime of such depravity that the potential sentence is life. The FBI's commitment to the protection of children is commensurate with the seriousness of the offense."

New York City Police Commissioner RAYMOND W. KELLY: "I want to commend the U.S. Attorney and his Assistants for swiftly prosecuting this allegation of child exploitation. Regrettably, it's a scourge that law enforcement encounters more than it should have to."

This case is being prosecuted by the Complex Frauds Unit. Assistant United States Attorney AMANDA KRAMER is in charge of the prosecution.

The charges in the criminal Complaint are merely accusations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Cyber Security Workshop: Emerging Trends in Crime & Attackers

Emerging Trends in Crime and Attackers in Cyber Security Workshop - How Criminal Groups Impact US Businesses and Government

Feb 18-19, 2009 in Arlington, VA

About this workshop:
This workshop will concentrate on information regarding the organized (and not so organized) criminal groups and how they impact business and government organizations. Topics will include: terrorism, activists, hackers/phishers, organized crime, child pornographers, and fraud rings. A discussion on how these groups operate, who they target, how they fund their operations, and how they cross-communicate will be included. The discussion and workshop will also include how to stay on top of these threats and design mitigation strategies to better protect your organization.

What you will Learn:
Who are the threats in the cyber-world and what are they doing
An understanding of the criminals’ sources, methods and operations
Mitigation Strategies – what can the organization do to combat these threats
Anticipation of Future modus operandi – what will be the next move for these criminal groups and how can organizations decrease their vulnerabilities

Registration Fee:
Government attendees: $699
Small Business (less than 100 employees): $749 per person
Industry (includes government contractors): $799 per person

More Information
http://www.homelanddefensejournal.com/hdl/Emerging-Trends-Crime-Attackers-Cyber-Security_Feb09.html

PROSECUTOR WISHES RAPIST WELL

By James H. Lilley

Eugene A. Marriott raped, sodomized and brutally beat a woman outside a Best Western Motel in Fairfax City on January 14, 2006. He was pulling up his pants, with the woman still lying at his feet, when police arrived and arrested him. An eyewitness to the crime said he was in an adjacent parking lot and saw Marriott standing over top of the woman and, “just pounding away on her.” He yelled at Marriott, but he continued his attack on the woman.

Marriott, who is married, is also a minister in The Ebenezer African Methodist Episcopal Church in Fort Washington. After his arrest he told detectives investigating the case that he’d dated the woman and what happened on January 14th was simply a matter of their sadomasochistic role-playing. The woman, however, told detectives they’d broken up weeks earlier. But, during the course of his interview with police he admitted that even if it had been role-playing that what he did that night was wrong.

Marriott entered a plea to charges of abduction with intent to defile and unlawful wounding, with the abduction with intent charge carrying a minimum sentence of 20 years. With his agreement to plead to those charges, prosecutors dismissed the rape and sodomy counts. But during trial proceedings prosecutors amended the charges to simple adduction, which carried no minimum sentence and a maximum of 10 years. They also added two misdemeanor sexual battery charges, to which Marriott agreed to plead guilty.

By pleading guilty to the two misdemeanor charges he escaped having to register as a sex offender, which would have been required by the “intent to defile” charge.

Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Toni Fay presented the case and said that what happened that night was criminal behavior, and showed photos of the victim to Circuit Court Judge Stanley Klein. Pictures offered into evidence showed that the victim had sustained cuts and bruises over her body from her lower legs to the top of her head. The victim said that she’d been beaten with fists and a belt buckle, raped and sexually assaulted. But, according to the Washington Post, Fay concluded her case by saying, “I wish Mr. Marriott well. I hope that his wife takes him back. I am very glad to see his church and his community are still supporting him.”

I’m surprised that she didn’t invite him out for dinner and drinks. Perhaps I missed something in the translation of all of this, but I was under the impression that Eugene A. Marriott was the accused in this instance, not the victim. Yet, it seems that the Fairfax County Prosecutor’s Office, or at least Toni Fay, went out of her way to assist him in eluding prosecution for the most serious crimes.

Marriott’s capacity as a minister at the Ebenezer AME Church doesn’t entitle him to preferential treatment when he stands accused of a serious crime, or any crime for that matter. He said he was sorry, but showed no emotion when he apologized. He went on to say that he’d lost everything he’d worked his whole life for, but continued to have the support of his church and his wife. The victim admitted she had dated him for about three months and their break up had been amicable. Although the victim dated her attacker for a time and agreed to meet him to go dancing on the night of the attack, it doesn’t qualify him for leniency. Indeed the court saw otherwise and sentenced him to only 16 months for his crimes immediately after sentencing two burglars to 18 and 20 months in prison. First, the prosecutor slaps the victim across the face by wishing her attacker well, and then the court puts its stamp of approval on the slap with a kick in the stomach and a sentence of only 16 months for a violent crime. Yet, Judge Klein said Marriott’s behavior wouldn’t be tolerated.

I don’t understand how a brutal beating and rape warrants less time in prison than a property crime. What was the court saying not only to the victim in this case, but also to the thousands of victims of rape and sexual assault across the country? Was the court sending a message that forcibly violating a woman’s body will get a suspect less jail time than a break in of a home or business?

Like it or not, there are many times when there is no real justice for the victim in the judicial system. But in this case far more went on behind the scenes than anyone was aware of. Toni Fay reduced the charges without consulting with the victim, the detective who investigated the allegations or her boss, Commonwealth’s Attorney Robert F. Horan.

The victim had already agreed with a deal struck by the prosecutor that Marriott would plead guilty to abduction with intent to defile and should have been consulted by Fay prior to any change in that deal. According to Mr. Horan, and anyone familiar with the justice system knows contacting the victim regarding any changes to the agreement is rule number one. Horan said the original plea agreement made sense and that lawyers who have defended accused rapists agreed, as did the victim in this instance.

Some time before the hearing, Marriott’s attorney, Bobby Stafford, contacted Fay and told her that Marriott did not want to have to register as a sex offender, which would have been required under the “intent to defile” charge. Fay was then in touch with Judge Klein, telling him that she and Stafford had been in contact to resolve the matter, but without informing him of just what that matter was. But at the time of sentencing neither the judge nor the attorneys made mention of the fact that the charges had been altered.

The 35-year-old victim in this case said she was shocked to learn that the charges had been reduced without notifying her, and was further angered by the lenient sentence. Her outrage was supported by May Lou Leary, executive director of the National Center for Victims of Crime. Leary said that when offenders are allowed to avoid responsibility for their crimes it has an effect on all victims, and especially victims of sex crimes. Sexual assault is a violent crime that is about domination and control of the victim, and what happened in this case reinforces that.

In some ways Judge Klein’s hands were tied when he sentenced Marriott, but if he wanted to give the victim some measure of satisfaction and justice he had options available to him. At sentencing he ordered Marriott to serve four years on each of the abduction and unlawful wounding counts, but then suspended all but 16 months of the terms. He then passed six-month sentences down on the two sexual battery counts and ordered all time to be served concurrently. If he so desired, he could have ordered those sentences to be served consecutively in lieu of concurrently and Marriott would have been given at least nine years behind bars. Still, even the nine years would have been a far cry from the minimum of 20 demanded by the abduction with intent to defile charge.

There was a grave miscarriage of justice in this case and another black eye for the judicial system as a whole. Commonwealth’s Attorney Robert Horan, who has always seemed to be a cut above when it came to fairness throughout the judicial process, is now faced with having to conduct damage control to repair the harm done to the reputation of his office.

Still, what happened in this case leaves me, and I’m certain hundreds of others, wondering just went on behind the scenes to cause such a lucrative deal to be struck. The flag of suspicion should be waving, and rightly so, because of the actions of Defense Attorney Bobby Stafford and Commonwealth’s Attorney Toni Fay. There are many questions in this case and I’m certain that Mr. Horan will live up to his reputation for fairness and honesty and demand the answers. Unfortunately, the damage has already been done to Mr. Horan’s office and not only the victim in this case, but also the countless other victims across the country have been slapped in the face.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
James H. Lilley is a former Marine and Police Sergeant with the Howard County Police Department (Maryland). He worked in the Uniformed Patrol Division, criminal Investigations Division, Forensic Services (CSI) and Drug Enforcement Division. His Street Drug Unit was featured in the book "Undercover" by Hans Halberstadt and published by Simon and Schuster. Some of his awards include The Medal of Valor, Four Bronze Stars, Four Unit Citations and the Governor's Citation. He is also an 8th Degree Black Belt in Shorin Ryu Karate and the first American to be promoted to the rank of Black Belt by Mr. Takeshi Miyagi. James H. Lilley is the author of six books: A Question of Honor; The Eyes of the Hunter; The Far Side of the Bridge; Just Retribution; A Miracle for Tony Clements; and, Death Knocks Twice.

MORE ABOUT JAMES H. LILLEY
http://www.police-writers.com/james_lilley.html

Public Safety Technology in the News

Tennessee Meth Task Force Adopts Mobile Narcotics Detection Solution
Government Technology, (08/28/2008)

Tennessee Meth Task Force (TMTF) agents now have a tool at their disposal that can provide near-instant detection and identification of narcotics and explosives in the field. The three MobileTrace units are capable of providing agents with reports in seconds that can then be submitted as evidence in court for drug-related prosecutions. The TMTF's previous tool for this type of work was a desktop device that limited mobility that was not capable of field detection. The unit's dual-mode ability detects narcotics and a wide array of explosives, and longer battery life provides agents with a tool that is effective, efficient, and ensures their safety.
www.govtech.com/gt/401898?topic=117680

TGen Find Promises Big Leap in Forensics
The Arizona Republic, (08/29/2008), Ken Alltucker

An "accidental discovery" by a team of researchers from Translational Genomics Research Institute and UCLA found that a technique used to identify disease triggers in a patient can also be used to identify individuals based on DNA samples from a busy crime scene. Using mixtures of DNA, the scientists were able to analyze the samples using microarrays, a high-powered automated technology to isolate an individual's DNA. The scientists concluded that the technology could isolate an individual's DNA even if the sample included 200 other DNA samples. This ability to isolate DNA samples from mixtures that large could help law enforcement with investigations of crime scenes such as a busy convenience store or a bank, where the samples often go unused because of the amount of DNA samples involved.
www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2008/08/29/20080829biz-dnaswab0829.html

police Using GPS. Units as Evidence in Crimes
The New York Times, (08/31/2008), Associated Press

The popularity of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) is helping authorities investigate crimes. Originally developed for use by military, GPS began showing up in the 1990s in consumer cars and trucks. Costs have dropped and the units have become more portable, which has made them more accessible. GPS has become a useful tool for the public, but now prosecutors and police are beginning to learn the full potential of these units for use as evidence. In 2005, a family was murdered in Chicago, and the suspect was convicted and sentenced to death this year based on data that was retrieved from the GPS unit in his SUV. The use of GPS can establish a defendant's whereabouts.
www.nytimes.com/2008/08/31/us/31gps.html?_r=1&ref=us&oref=slogin

Deputies' Cars to Get Digital Upgrade
The Arizona Republic, (09/04/2008), Yvonne Wingett and JJ Hensley

Maricopa County will be purchasing an upgraded communications system to speed sheriff's deputies' response to emergency calls. The new system will replace standard radios in patrol cars and provide deputies instant access to multiple databases prior to engaging suspects or responding to calls. It allows deputies to check for warrants and other information without radioing and waiting for dispatch to respond. Computerized equipment, similar to laptops, will initially cost the county about $2 million, with an annual maintenance cost of $850,000. At this point, it is unclear how this system will impact the department's self-imposed response time of 5 minutes or less on priority one calls, but the agency hopes is it will help the agency maintain that goal or come in under it.
www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2008/09/04/20080904MCSOresponse0904.html

City Uses Technology to Track Speeders
NBC4, (09/04/2008), Denise Yost

Columbus city officials will be deploying 10 smart speed trailers throughout the city to capture data relating to when and where speeding is occurring. City officials will then turn the data over to the city police to evaluate and use to decide where to deploy officers. Also, the city plans to implement a rotating schedule for placing the trailers, using information from the community through requests received on the city's 311 information line.
www.nbc4i.com/midwest/cmh/crime_watch.apx.-content-articles-CMH-2008-09-04-0019.html

New 911 Technology is Call of the Future
The Telegraph, (09/06/2008), Cynthia M. Ellis

At the National Emergency Numbers Association conference, Madison County 911 coordinator Bill Gamblin stated, "There is a generation of people who doesn't leave home with out their [cell] phone." This is the premise and driving force behind the creation and development of the Next Generation 911, or NG991, that is an updated 911 system that can use and be accessed in a wireless society. It would allow witnesses to a catastrophic or HAZMAT event to use their cell phones to provide video footage of the event, still images, or allow text messages describing the scene. It would also interact with automated vehicle systems that would alert the 911 center in response to an airbag deploy and provide 911 with the car driver's medical records. For the first responders, this system would then provide the chance for dispatchers to forward the footage and images to allow the responders a chance to understand and prepare for the scene prior to arrival.
www.thetelegraph.com/news/gamblin_17981___article.html/ng911_calls.html

DNA Testing Expands to Lesser Crimes
The Washington Post, (09/08/2008), Dan Morse

Advances in the processing of DNA samples from crime scenes have made it a tool not only to be used for crimes like rape and murder, but also for the less violent crimes like burglary, robbery, and drug dealing. An example of that is a 2002 Starbucks robbery case in Montgomery County, Maryland, where the suspect left behind a half-empty cup of coffee. No arrests were made in the case.. Then in 2007 the DNA sample was run against the state's database of felons and a there was a match. The suspect is on trial. Prosecutors hope the introduction of DNA sampling into these less violent crimes will speed the criminal justice process by leading to more guilty pleas. The director of Montgomery County's crime lab hopes that by spring his lab will be using robots to extract DNA samples. The robots and a new gene sequencing technology are hoped to increase DNA analysis by 30 percent and make it a more efficient tool for the less violent crimes.
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/07/AR2008090702340.html?hpid=moreheadlines

A Way to Find Hidden Fingerprints
Technology Review, (09/04/2008), Brittany Sauser

Physical evidence is needed by investigators to tie a criminal to a crime and that physical evidence can be as small as a fingerprint. But sometimes that evidence can't be seen because it has been washed away or because of the violent nature of the crime. In an explosion or in the case of arson, the print can be removed. Now with the discovery by Forensic Scientist John Bond, those invisible prints can be found. The findings are that when metals such as copper or brass come into contact with the oils and chemicals that make up a fingerprint, the metals corrode slightly. The corroded spots can only be removed with abrasive cleaning. In order for this invisible print to become visible, investigators have to apply voltage to the metal and apply a metallic powder that adheres to the areas that have corroded. This technique can be used for things like shell casings or metal shrapnel from a bomb, but because of the small nature of these pieces of evidence, getting a reliable fi! ngerprint becomes an issue.
www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/21331/?a=f

New York City Enhances Technology for Crime Fighting
InformationWeek, (09/10/2008), K.C. Jones

New York City will now have the ability to accept photos or videos from citizens regarding quality of life complaints and reports of criminal activity. This comes after the New York Police Department last month announced it's ability to accept tips via text messages. The implementation of this sort of technology is a fulfillment of Mayor Michael Bloomberg's State of the City promise. Callers can either contact 911 to report criminal activity or 311 for quality of life complaints. For criminal reports, detectives will follow up the original 911 call and explain how to provide the video or photographs to police. For quality of life complaints callers inform the dispatcher that they have photos or video to provide and receive instructions from the dispatcher or they are directed to the New York City homepage to upload their information. Bloomberg feels the new technology will bring the city up a level regarding fighting crime and making city government accountable for condit! ions in the city.
www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/cameras/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=210600911&subSection=All+Stories

police Probe Cell Phones to Thwart Criminals
San Francisco Chronicle, (09/08/2008), Tom Abate

Wireless technology available to would-be criminals dictates that the law enforcement community look in new places for evidence. For the San Francisco police that means adoption of new technology that extracts evidence from cell phones. San Francisco has acquired technology from multiple vendors that allows police to extract data such as text messages, contact lists, or images that the user may have thought were deleted from the phone's memory. The commercial version of these devices allows consumers to transfer data from one phone to the other in the event of a phone upgrade or change in service provider. For law enforcement, however, the technology allows extraction of data to help prevent corruption of evidence.
www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/09/07/BUPA12OC2V.DTL