Commissioner’s
Son (a Zoning Board Member), and Another Associate Also Plead Guilty to
Participating in the Bribery Scheme and to Drug Trafficking
ATLANTA—A Gwinnett County Commissioner,
Shirley Lasseter, 64, of Duluth, pleaded guilty today in federal district court
to accepting bribes in exchange for her support for a proposed real estate
development in her district. Lasseter’s son, John Fanning, 34, of Dacula, and
Carl “Skip” Cain, 65, of Flowery Branch, an associate of Lasseter’s, also
pleaded guilty today to participating in the bribery scheme and to drug
trafficking.
“Today’s guilty pleas are part of an
on-going effort to root out public corruption in Gwinnett County,” said U.S.
Attorney Sally Yates. “The citizens of Gwinnett County have a right to elected
officials who serve the public. Instead, these defendants used the office of a
county commissioner to line their pockets by taking payoffs from individuals
whom they believed to be drug traffickers. These defendants broke the public
trust and the law. We will continue to aggressively pursue corrupt public
officials and those who conspire with them.”
Brian D. Lamkin, Special Agent in
Charge, FBI Atlanta Field Office, stated, “Today’s guilty pleas are the
culmination of an extensive investigation by the FBI and demonstrates the FBI’s
commitment toward such public corruption investigations, to include those
involving elected officials. Anyone with information regarding public
corruption activities are urged to contact their nearest FBI field office.”
According to United States Attorney
Yates, the charges and other information presented in court, Lasseter serves as
the elected District One Commissioner on the Gwinnett County Board of
Commissioners. Fanning is Lasseter’s son and operates a landscaping business.
Fanning was also a member of the Gwinnett County Zoning Appeals Board, a
position with a one-year term that began in February 2011 after he was
appointed by his mother.
Lasseter, Fanning, and Cain agreed to
sell Lasseter’s official approval of and vote for a proposed real estate
development in her district to an undercover agent with the FBI, who was posing
as a businessman. Cain, who works at a trucking business, served as a “bagman”
for Lasseter and Fanning, arranging the bribes required for their official
approval and setting up meetings with them for the payment of the requested
bribes. After Cain said that he was interested in making money from drug
trafficking and illegal money laundering, the undercover agent told the
defendants a fabricated story that he laundered money for drug dealers and that
drug trafficking proceeds would fund the proposed real estate development.
In multiple meetings, Lasseter and
Fanning told the undercover agent that Lasseter’s approval and vote regarding
the proposed development was for sale. They also told the undercover agent that
Fanning could use his position as a member of the Zoning Appeals Board to help
secure any necessary approvals or variances. Lasseter also discussed with the
agent the possibility that, in exchange for the requested bribes, the county
would buy any portions of the property that could not be developed profitably.
Although Lasseter said that such a purchase would be difficult because a state
special grand jury had investigated county land purchases, she confirmed that
she would secure the necessary approvals for the undercover agent to develop
the property.
In exchange for Lasseter’s official
approval and vote, the defendants demanded and were paid or promised the
following benefits:
■Lasseter received a total of $36,500 in
cash, paid in several installments, the largest installment being a $26,000
cash payment that she and Fanning counted out together to ensure that the total
was correct. Each time Lasseter received cash in exchange for her official
action on the proposed development, she confirmed to the undercover agent that
she would give her official approval and vote for the proposed development.
■Cain was paid a total of $10,000, which
he demanded as his fee for arranging Lasseter and Fanning’s involvement.
■Fanning was to receive an ownership
stake in a business to be located in the proposed development.
Lasseter, Fanning, and Cain also said
that they wanted to work with the undercover agent on additional matters
involving misuse of Lasseter’s official position and other illegal activities.
In several meetings, Lasseter and Fanning sought to enlist the agent’s help as
a bag man in leveraging Lasseter’s official position to enrich themselves
personally from the proposed privatization of the Gwinnett County Airport.
In addition, Fanning and Cain acted as
couriers delivering what they believed to be cocaine and what they believed to
be drug money. Fanning and Cain each laundered $10,000 cash, keeping an amount
that represented what they understood to be the standard fee for laundering
proceeds from illegal drug trafficking. Fanning and Cain also transported a
substance that they believed to be cocaine from the New York City area to
Atlanta. After flying to the New York City area and spending the night, Fanning
and Cain flew back with four kilograms of sham cocaine. After their plane
landed in Atlanta, Fanning and Cain each took possession of two kilograms to
make a delivery to a prospective buyer. Law enforcement officers detained
Fanning and Cain before they could make the planned delivery. Law enforcement
officers also confronted Lasseter the same day. All three defendants are
cooperating with law enforcement.
Lasseter was charged in a criminal
information on May 31, 2012, with corruptly soliciting and accepting a bribe.
She pleaded guilty and could receive a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison
and a fine of up to $250,000. Fanning and Cain were charged in the same
criminal information with participating in the bribery scheme and with drug
trafficking. Fanning and Cain pleaded guilty to those charges and could receive
a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 on the
bribery count. Fanning and Cain face a mandatory minimum sentence of five years
on the drug trafficking count, which carries a maximum sentence of forty years
and a fine of up to $5,000,000. In determining the actual sentence, the Court
will consider the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which are not binding
but provide appropriate sentencing ranges for most offenders.
Sentencing is scheduled for August 6,
2012, before United States District Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr.
This case is being investigated by
special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Assistant United States Attorney Douglas
W. Gilfillan is prosecuting the case.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta
recommends parents and children learn about the dangers of drugs at the
following website: www.justthinktwice.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment