A Brecksville man was charged with conspiracy to commit wire
fraud after he and another man conspired to steal products from another
company, relabel them and sell the product under false pretenses to various
health care providers.
Ryan H. Tennebar, 38, was the Director of Operations at
Healthcare Essentials Inc. (HEI), an Ohio company that primarily distributed
negative pressure therapy systems, also known as wound care vaccums, which
promote wound healing by delivering negative pressure to patients’ wounds.
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. (KCI) was a corporation whose parent
company was based in Texas. KCI developed, manufactured, and distributed
proprietary wound care vaccums. KCI maintained exclusive rights for sale and
distribution of its wound care vacuums to its customers, which typically
included nursing homes, hospitals and rehabilitation centers.
According to the criminal information filed in U.S. District
Court:
Tennebar conspired with a person identified as
co-conspirator number one, who worked for KCI at a facility in El Paso.
Tennebar communicated with the conspirator between 2013 and 2016 to request KCI
wound vacuums, which were illegally taken from KCI facilities, nursing homes,
hosptials and rehabilitation centers. The conspirator continued to fraudulently
acquire KCI wound care vacuums even after he was terminated as a KCI employee
in 2014.
Tennebar and the conspirator fraudulently relabeled the KCI
products with HEI labels. The original KCI serial numbers were often
obliterated.
Tennebar then falsely represented to HEI’s prospective
customers that HEI was an authorized distributor of KCI wound care vacuums.
Tennebar sent the conspirator approximately $619,000 between
2013 and 2016 for stolen wound care vacuums. The actions of Tennebar, the
conspirator and others resulted in a loss to KCI of approximately $4.2 million,
according to the information.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys
Robert J. Patton and Matthew B. Kall following an investigation by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation.
If convicted, the defendant’s sentence will be determined by
the Court after reviewing factors unique to this case, including the
defendant’s prior criminal records, if any, the defendant’s role in the offense
and the characteristics of the violation. In all cases the sentence will not
exceed the statutory maximum and in most cases it will be less than the maximum.
An information is only a charge and is not evidence of
guilt. Defendants are entitled to a fair trial in which it will be the
government’s burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
No comments:
Post a Comment