The United States Attorney’s Office for
the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced today that an indictment charging
a 31-year-old Falls Church, Virginia resident with producing and attempting to
produce child pornography has been unsealed. The indictment was filed under
seal on April 10, 2012.
According to United States Attorney
Peter J. Smith, the indictment alleges that Christopher Julich persuaded and
enticed a minor in Lackawanna County to perform sexual acts on a webcam that
were transmitted to Virginia.
The charge against Julich resulted from
an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Lackawanna County
Detectives, and Fairfax County Police, Virginia.
Julich was arrested by federal agents in
Virginia. He was arraigned on May 24 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Thomas M.
Blewitt. Judge Blewitt ordered Julich to remain in prison pending trial. U.S.
District Court Judge Robert Mariani scheduled trial for July 23, 2012.
If convicted of the charge, Julich faces
a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years in prison and a possible maximum
sentence of 30 years in prison.
This case was brought as part of Project
Safe Childhood, a U.S. Department of Justice nationwide initiative to combat
child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by United States Attorneys’ Offices
and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS),
Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better
locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the
Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about
Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov.
The case is being prosecuted by
Assistant U.S. Attorney Francis P. Sempa.
****
An indictment and criminal information
are not evidence of guilt but simply descriptions of the charge made by the United
States Attorney against a defendant. A charged defendant is presumed innocent
until a jury returns a unanimous finding that the United States has proved the
defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
No comments:
Post a Comment