David B. Fein, United States Attorney
for the District of Connecticut, announced that a federal grand jury sitting in
New Haven today returned a three-count indictment that charges Robert Braddock,
Jr., 33, of Meriden, with participating in a conspiracy to conceal the source
of contributions to the campaign of a candidate for the U.S. House of
Representatives on which he worked.
The indictment alleges that Braddock,
while employed as the Finance Director for the campaign of a candidate for the
U.S. House of Representatives, conspired to accept conduit campaign
contributions, which are contributions made by one person in the name of
another person. The purpose of the conduit contributions was to conceal the
fact that the individuals who were actually financing the payments had an
interest in legislation that was expected to be introduced, and eventually was
introduced, before the Connecticut General Assembly during the 2012 legislative
session. The candidate is also a current member of the Connecticut General
Assembly.
“This indictment details an extensive
conspiracy to corrupt the electoral process,” stated U.S. Attorney Fein. “The
U.S. Attorney’s Office and the FBI continue to investigate not only this
matter, but all illegal behavior that corrupts our system of government.”
According to the indictment, Roll Your
Own (“RYO”) smoke shops are retail businesses that sell loose smoking tobacco
and cigarette-rolling materials and offer customers the option of paying a
“rental” fee to insert the loose tobacco and the rolling materials into a RYO
machine, which is capable of rapidly rolling large quantities of cigarettes.
Customers do not pay a tax on the RYO cigarettes when rolled by the RYO
machines, in contrast to cigarettes purchased over-the-counter. In August 2011,
the state of Connecticut applied for an order permanently enjoining the RYO
smoke shops from operating RYO machines, which the state argued were tobacco
manufacturing devices under Connecticut law.
The indictment alleges that, in 2011,
certain RYO smoke shop owners and others began to discuss the possibility that
the Connecticut General Assembly would enact legislation harmful to RYO smoke
shop owners’ business interests during the 2012 legislative session. In
November 2011, the RYO shop owners arranged to meet with the member of the
General Assembly to discuss their concerns. Also in November 2011, the RYO shop
owners and others began to deliver to Braddock and the campaign checks in the
amount of $2,500, which were, in fact, conduit contributions. Typically, the
contributors were reimbursed with cash from one or more of the RYO shop owners.
In November and December 2011, Braddock accepted a total of four $2,500 conduit
campaign contributions.
The indictment further alleges that, on
April 3, 2012, the Connecticut General Assembly’s Joint Committee on Finance,
Revenue, and Bonding voted in favor of Senate Bill 357, legislation that would
deem RYO smoke shop owners to be tobacco manufacturers under Connecticut law, a
designation that would have subjected RYO smoke shop owners to a substantial
licensing fee and tax increase. Approximately one week later, Braddock accepted
an additional four $2,500 checks in the names of conduit contributors.
On May 9, 2012, the legislative session
ended, and the legislation had not been called for a vote by either chamber of
the General Assembly.
The indictment alleges that, on May 14,
2012, a co-conspirator who helped to arrange the previous eight conduit
contributions delivered $10,000 to the campaign in the form of three $2,500
conduit contributions made payable to the campaign and one $2,500 conduit
contribution made payable to a political party. After Braddock was informed by
the co-conspirator the next day that one of the contributions was in the form
of a bank check provided by one of the Roll-Your-Own shop owners, Braddock
arranged for the check not to be deposited into the campaign’s bank account. On
May 16, 2012, the co-conspirator and another co-conspirator, who was an aide to
the campaign, met at a restaurant in Southington. At that meeting, the
co-conspirator provided the campaign aide with a replacement $2,500 check in
the name of a different conduit contributor who was not affiliated with any
Roll-Your-Own shops.
The investigation of this matter has
included numerous recorded conversations, as well as an FBI special agents
acting in an undercover capacity.
The indictment charges Braddock with one
count of conspiracy to conceal federal campaign contributions, a charge that
carries a maximum term of five years and a fine of up to $250,000. Braddock
also is charged with one count of accepting federal campaign contributions made
by persons in the names of others, a charge that carries a maximum term of
imprisonment of two years and a fine of up to $250,000. Finally, Braddock is
charged with one count of causing false reports to be filed with the Federal
Election Commission, a charge that carries a maximum term of imprisonment of
five years and a fine of up to $250,000.
U.S. Attorney Fein stressed that an
indictment is not evidence of guilt. Charges are only allegations, and each
defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt.
This matter is being investigated by the
Federal Bureau of Investigation and is being prosecuted by Assistant United
States Attorneys Christopher M. Mattei and Eric J. Glover.
No comments:
Post a Comment